Summary of the 2022 ACR Intersociety Meeting.

The ACR Intersociety Committee meeting of 2022 (ISC-2022) was convened around the theme of "Recovering From The Great Resignation, Moral Injury and Other Stressors: Rebuilding Radiology for a Robust Future." Representatives from 29 radiology organizations, including all radiology subspecialties, radiation oncology, and medical physics, as well as academic and private practice radiologists, met for 3 days in early August in Park City, Utah, to search for solutions to the most pressing problems facing the specialty of radiology in 2022. Of these, the mismatch between the clinical workload and the available radiologist workforce was foremost-as many other identifiable problems flowed downstream from this, including high job turnover, lack of time for teaching and research, radiologist burnout, and moral injury.

First-Year Radiology Residents Teaching Anatomy to First-Year Medical Students: A Symbiotic Relationship.

OBJECTIVES: Our institution has developed an educational program in which first-year radiology residents teach first-year medical students during gross anatomy laboratory sessions. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of this program on medical student knowledge and perceptions of radiology, and on resident attitudes toward teaching. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First-year resident pairs taught small groups of medical students during weekly 15-minute interactive sessions, and were evaluated on teaching skills by senior residents. A survey about attitudes toward radiology and a knowledge quiz were sent to the medical students, and a survey about attitudes toward teaching was sent to the first-year radiology residents, both pre-course and post-course. RESULTS: Students' radiology knowledge significantly increased between the pre-course and post-course survey across all categories tested (P < 0.001). Additionally, there were significant improvements in terms of students' confidence in radiologic anatomy skills, perceived importance of radiology for medical training, familiarity with the field of radiology, and perception that radiologists are friendly (P < 0.001). Radiology residents felt more confident in their teaching proficiency (P < 0.001) by the conclusion of the course. CONCLUSIONS: Resident-led small-group teaching sessions during anatomy laboratory are mutually beneficial for medical students and radiology residents. The program also allows radiology residents to be exposed early on in residency to teaching and academic medicine.

Evaluating the Impact of a Call Triage Assistant on Resident Efficiency, Errors, and Stress.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a call triage assistant, who answered telephone calls to the main reading room during the busiest hours of weekend call, would impact resident workflow efficiency, diagnostic errors, and stress level. METHODS: The call triage assistant answered all telephone calls to the main reading room from 12 pm to 7 pm on 6 weekend days over a 3-month period. We compared report turnaround times and resident discrepancy rates on these days with control days, when the same residents were on call without the assistant. We also surveyed residents to determine whether the assistants relieved anxiety associated with the call shift. RESULTS: We recorded 168 telephone calls over the study period. We found the majority of telephone calls could be handled by the assistant without disturbing the on-call resident, resulting in a 71% reduction in interruptions. The mean turnaround time for studies read on the days the assistant was on duty was 44.3 min, compared with 75.2 min on the control days (P < .01). Resident major discrepancy rates (0.4% on the intervention days compared to 0.2% on the control days) were similar (P = .58), as were minor discrepancy rates (7.5% on the intervention days compared with 6.7% on the control days; P = .61). Residents reported fewer distractions, improved workflow efficiency, and decreased call-related stress when the assistant was on duty. CONCLUSIONS: A call triage assistant effectively improved workflow efficiency and reduced resident stress on call. Resident error rates were unaffected by the presence of the assistant.

Teaching Radiology Trainees From the Perspective of a Millennial.

The millennial generation consists of today's medical students, radiology residents, fellows, and junior staff. Millennials' comfort with immersive technology, high expectations for success, and desire for constant feedback differentiate them from previous generations. Drawing from an author's experiences through radiology residency and fellowship as a millennial, from published literature, and from the mentorship of a long-time radiology educator, this article explores educational strategies that embrace these characteristics to engage today's youngest generation both in and out of the reading room.

The High-Performing Radiology Residency: A Case Study.

The primary goal of any radiology residency program is to train clinically competent radiologists. However, some radiology programs go above and beyond basic ACGME requirements and produce highly productive radiologists who contribute to the field in research, education and technology. At the core of such residencies are the people who comprise it, including self-motivated, personable residents and faculty who can facilitate excellence from their trainees. Indeed, radiology residencies which create unique programs in response to evolving resident interests can help foster resident-driven research, advocacy, technological innovation and early leadership. These unique programs, when interwoven with a strong educational foundation driven by evidence-based learning techniques and informatics-driven evaluation programs, function to produce highly competent clinicians who become leaders in the field.

Attending Radiologist Variability and Its Effect on Radiology Resident Discrepancy Rates.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Discrepancy rates for interpretations produced in a call situation are one metric to evaluate residents during training. Current benchmarks, reported in previous studies, do not consider the effects of practice pattern variability among attending radiologists. This study aims to investigate the impact of attending variability on resident discrepancy rates to determine if the current benchmarks are an accurate measure of resident performance and, if necessary, update discrepancy benchmarks to accurately identify residents performing below expectations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All chest radiographs, musculoskeletal (MSK) radiographs, chest computed tomographies (CTs), abdomen and pelvis CTs, and head CTs interpreted by postgraduate year-3 residents in a call situation over 5 years were reviewed for the presence of a significant discrepancy and composite results compared to prior findings. Simulations of the expected discrepancy distribution for an "average resident" were then performed using Gibbs sampling, and this distribution was compared to the actual resident distribution. RESULTS: A strong inverse correlation between resident volume and discrepancy rates was found. There was wide variability among attendings in both overread volume and propensity to issue a discrepancy, although there was no significant correlation. Simulations show that previous benchmarks match well for chest radiographs, abdomen and pelvis CTs, and head CTs but not for MSK radiographs and chest CTs. The simulations also demonstrate a large effect of attending practice patterns on resident discrepancy rates. CONCLUSIONS: The large variability in attending practice patterns suggests direct comparison of residents using discrepancy rates is unlikely to reflect true performance. Current benchmarks for chest radiographs, abdomen and pelvis CTs, and head CTs are appropriate and correctly flag residents whose performance may benefit from additional attention, whereas those for MSK radiographs and chest CTs are likely too strict.

Learning, technology and intellectual property: a survey of the philosophies and preferences of our trainees and peers.

BACKGROUND: Increasing workloads threaten the quality of teaching in academic radiology practices. There is a wealth of unfiltered educational resources for radiology on the internet. As a digital native, today's radiology trainee may have differing opinions from teachers about learning and intellectual property. OBJECTIVE: To identify the preferences and philosophies regarding learning, technology and intellectual property toward the future development of an innovative radiology curriculum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic survey with 22 questions was sent to 2,010 members of the Society for Pediatric Radiology and 100 radiology trainees. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-one of the 2,110 surveys were returned. All questions were completed in 342 surveys. Fifty-three respondents were trainees (residents and fellows) and 289 respondents were radiologists (teachers). Time needed for a single learning activity in both groups is <30 min, but teachers spend less time (P=0.007). The preferred learning environments were point-of-care and outside work hours for both groups. Ideal lecture durations were 31-45 min for trainees and 21-30 min for teachers (P=0.001). Adoption of new technology showed late majority and laggard trends for both groups (P=0.296). Interest in gadgets was greater in trainees (17%) than teachers (2%) (P<0.001). Interest in lecture recording was greater in trainees (84%) than teachers (61%) (P=0.008). More trainees (61%) than teachers (42%) would not charge money for educational materials (P=0.028); 27% versus 13%, respectively, disagreed with dissemination of those materials beyond the institution (P=0.013). CONCLUSION: While millennial trainees are adult learners with a stronger comfort with technology, learning styles of trainees and teachers are more similar than was previously believed. Trainees and teachers hold conflicting philosophies about intellectual property. Results herein speak favorably for revising our teaching portfolio to include practical learning materials of short duration available at point-of-care.

Milestones on a Shoestring: A Cost-Effective, Semi-automated Implementation of the New ACGME Requirements for Radiology.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The advent of the ACGME's Next Accreditation System represents a significant new challenge for residencies and fellowships, owing to its requirements for more complex and detailed information. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We developed a system of online assessment tools to provide comprehensive coverage of the twelve ACGME Milestones and digitized them using freely available cloud-based productivity tools. These tools include a combination of point-of-care procedural assessments, electronic quizzes, online modules, and other data entry forms. Using free statistical analytic tools, we also developed an automated system for management, processing, and data reporting. RESULTS: After one year of use, our Milestones project has resulted in the submission of over 20,000 individual data points. The use of automated statistical methods to generate resident-specific profiles has allowed for dynamic reports of individual residents' progress. These profiles both summarize data and also allow program directors access to more granular information as needed. CONCLUSION: Informatics-driven strategies for data assessment and processing represent feasible solutions to Milestones assessment and analysis, reducing the potential administrative burden for program directors, residents, and staff.

Transoral robotic surgery in head and neck cancer: what radiologists need to know about the cutting edge.

The evolution of oncologic surgical technology has moved toward reducing patient morbidity and mortality without compromising oncologic resection or oncologic outcomes. The goals in treating head and neck cancer are to cure patients, as well as to provide quality of life by improving functional and social outcomes through organ-preservation therapies, which may include surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation therapy. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is an emerging technique that provides several benefits over existing treatment regimens and over open surgery for head and neck cancer, including reductions in operative times, blood loss, intensive care unit stays, and overall duration of patient hospitalization. Transoral robotic techniques allow wide-view, high-resolution, magnified three-dimensional optics for visualization of the mucosal surfaces of the head and neck through an endoscope, while avoiding the extensive external cervical incisions often required for open surgeries. Radiologists play an important role in the successful outcome of these procedures, both before and after TORS. Determining a cancer patient's surgical candidacy for TORS requires a thorough preoperative radiologic evaluation, coupled with clinical and intraoperative assessment. Radiologists must pay particular attention to important anatomic landmarks that are clinical blind spots for surgeons. Knowledge of the expected postoperative imaging appearances, so that they can be distinguished from recurrent disease and second primary tumors, is essential for all radiologists involved in the care of these patients.

Synchronous verrucous carcinoma and inverted papilloma of the lacrimal sac: case report and clinical update.

Inverted papilloma is a benign epithelial tumor of the nasal cavity. It is known to coexist with malignancy in 5 to 13% of cases, with squamous cell carcinoma being the most common malignancy. Another associated malignancy, one that is extremely rare, is verrucous carcinoma. To the best of our knowledge, no case of verrucous carcinoma occurring alone or in association with another neoplasm has been described in the nasolacrimal system. We report a case of synchronous verrucous carcinoma and inverted papilloma of the lacrimal sac in a 47-year-old man. The patient presented with epiphora, nasal obstruction, swelling of the left medial canthus, and drainage of a foul-smelling fluid from the left nostril. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging detected the presence of a large mass occupying the left nasal cavity and sinuses with extension into the nasopharynx. In addition, bony invasion of the anteroinferomedial wall of the left orbit was noted with extension of the tumor into the orbit itself, which resulted in lateral displacement of the left medial rectus muscle. The patient underwent endoscopic debulking of the left sinonasal lesion. Of note, the surgery had to be completed in stages because of excessive blood loss. Histopathologic examination of the intranasal component of the tumor identified it as an inverted papilloma. One month after the intranasal resection, a left dacryocystectomy was performed; histopathologic examination revealed that an invasive verrucous squamous cell carcinoma had arisen within the inverted papilloma.

Increased error rates in preliminary reports issued by radiology residents working more than 10 consecutive hours overnight.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine if the rate of major discrepancies between resident preliminary reports and faculty final reports increases during the final hours of consecutive 12-hour overnight call shifts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board exemption status was obtained for this study. All overnight radiology reports interpreted by residents on-call between January 2010 and June 2010 were reviewed by board-certified faculty and categorized as major discrepancies if they contained a change in interpretation with the potential to impact patient management or outcome. Initial determination of a major discrepancy was at the discretion of individual faculty radiologists based on this general definition. Studies categorized as major discrepancies were secondarily reviewed by the residency program director (M.H.S.) to ensure consistent application of the major discrepancy designation. Multiple variables associated with each report were collected and analyzed, including the time of preliminary interpretation, time into shift study was interpreted, volume of studies interpreted during each shift, day of the week, patient location (inpatient or emergency department), block of shift (2-hour blocks for 12-hour shifts), imaging modality, patient age and gender, resident identification, and faculty identification. Univariate risk factor analysis was performed to determine the optimal data format of each variable (ie, continuous versus categorical). A multivariate logistic regression model was then constructed to account for confounding between variables and identify independent risk factors for major discrepancies. RESULTS: We analyzed 8062 preliminary resident reports with 79 major discrepancies (1.0%). There was a statistically significant increase in major discrepancy rate during the final 2 hours of consecutive 12-hour call shifts. Multivariate analysis confirmed that interpretation during the last 2 hours of 12-hour call shifts (odds ratio (OR) 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-3.21), cross-sectional imaging modality (OR 5.38, 95% CI 3.22-8.98), and inpatient location (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.02-3.20) were independent risk factors for major discrepancy. CONCLUSIONS: In a single academic medical center, major discrepancies in resident preliminary reports increased significantly during the final 2 hours of consecutive 12-hour overnight call shifts. This finding could be related to either fatigue or circadian desynchronization. Discrimination of these two potential etiologies requires additional investigation as major discrepancies in resident reports have the potential to negatively impact patient care/outcome. Cross-sectional imaging modalities including computed tomography and ultrasound (versus conventional radiography), as well as inpatient location (versus Emergency Department location), were also associated with significantly higher major discrepancy rates.

Using focused missed-case conferences to reduce discrepancies in musculoskeletal studies interpreted by residents on call.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine whether focused missed-case conferences can significantly reduce the number of major discrepancies in musculoskeletal imaging studies interpreted by residents on call. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of major discrepancies in musculoskeletal conventional radiography imaging studies interpreted by radiology residents and fellows on call from July 2008 to July 2009 revealed 31 common and important musculoskeletal injuries missed or misinterpreted at our institution. These missed cases were presented during focused missed-case conferences from July through October 2009. Only residents attended missed-case conferences. RESULTS: Over the 12 months before the missed-case conferences, there were 55 resident major discrepancies and 25 fellow major discrepancies, representing 31 common and important missed musculoskeletal injuries. Over the 12 months after the missed-case conferences, there were 18 resident major discrepancies and 21 fellow major discrepancies involving these injuries. This corresponds to a 67% reduction in the number of resident major discrepancies involving the 31 musculoskeletal injuries covered during the missed-case conferences (chi-square p < 0.001). The overall major discrepancy rate for all musculoskeletal conventional radiography studies was 1.19% for residents and 1.55% for fellows (not significant) before the missed-case conferences and 0.87% for residents and 1.46% for fellows (p < 0.05) after the missed-case conferences. During this time, fellows missed more musculoskeletal injuries related to the topics discussed during missed-case conferences (16) compared with residents (8) although fellows read significantly fewer studies overall. This accounted for 0.49% of the 0.59% difference between residents and fellows. CONCLUSION: Focused missed-case conferences are an effective educational intervention to significantly reduce the number of major discrepancies in radiology resident interpretation of musculoskeletal imaging studies on call.

Identifying benchmarks for discrepancy rates in preliminary interpretations provided by radiology trainees at an academic institution.

PURPOSE: At many academic medical centers, radiology house staff provide preliminary interpretations for imaging studies after hours, the accuracy and timely availability of which are crucial to patient care. Nevertheless, these preliminary interpretations are sometimes discrepant with finalized attending reports. The rate of such discrepancies can provide valuable information for quality improvement. The aim of this study was to identify specific benchmarks for resident discrepancy rates by reviewing all 73,072 on-call reports generated at the authors' institution over 1 year. METHODS: A custom-built interface called Orion was used to track all on-call reports generated in 2010. Reports graded as discrepant with major changes during attending review were automatically identified. The turnaround time (TAT) of all reports was measured. These data were used to identify specific benchmarks for resident performance on call. RESULTS: A total of 45,608 of 73,072 preliminary dictations (62%) were interpreted by residents; of these, 407 (0.89%) had major discrepancies. The major discrepancy rates varied among individual residents (0.2% to 1.8%), modalities, and level of resident training. On the basis of distributions, major discrepancy benchmarks were established for overall rate (1.7%) and for the modalities of conventional radiography (1.5%), CT (4.0%), and ultrasound (4.0%). The mean TAT was significantly shorter for the emergency department (46 minutes) than for inpatient services (144 minutes). A benchmark TAT of 1 hour has been adopted for all imaging studies performed through the emergency department. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying benchmarks for major discrepancy rates and TAT of preliminary interpretations by radiology trainees is a valuable first step for individual and departmental quality improvement.

Orion: a web-based application designed to monitor resident and fellow performance on-call.

Radiology residency and fellowship training provides a unique opportunity to evaluate trainee performance and determine the impact of various educational interventions. We have developed a simple software application (Orion) using open-source tools to facilitate the identification and monitoring of resident and fellow discrepancies in on-call preliminary reports. Over a 6-month period, 19,200 on-call studies were interpreted by 20 radiology residents, and 13,953 on-call studies were interpreted by 25 board-certified radiology fellows representing eight subspecialties. Using standard review macros during faculty interpretation, each of these reports was classified as "agreement", "minor discrepancy", and "major discrepancy" based on the potential to impact patient management or outcome. Major discrepancy rates were used to establish benchmarks for resident and fellow performance by year of training, modality, and subspecialty, and to identify residents and fellows demonstrating a significantly higher major discrepancy rate compared with their classmates. Trends in discrepancies were used to identify subspecialty-specific areas of increased major discrepancy rates in an effort to tailor the didactic and case-based curriculum. A series of missed-case conferences were developed based on trends in discrepancies, and the impact of these conferences is currently being evaluated. Orion is a powerful information technology tool that can be used by residency program directors, fellowship programs directors, residents, and fellows to improve radiology education and training.

Using a web-based application to enhance resident training and improve performance on-call.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: It is common practice in academic hospitals for radiology residents to provide preliminary interpretations for radiologic examinations performed in the emergency department (ED) during off-hours. In this study, we used a software program called Minerva to identify and track discrepancies between resident and faculty interpretation of ED studies. The objective was to determine if missed case conferences could reduce the number of resident discrepancies related to the types of cases reviewed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used Minerva to identify and grade faculty-modified resident preliminary reports as minor or major discrepancies depending on whether the discrepancy had the potential to affect patient management or outcome. Minor and major discrepancy rates were calculated for all residents to evaluate call performance, establish benchmarks, and develop interventions to reduce the number of discrepant cases. RESULTS: The total discrepancy rate for all residents (n = 22) was 2.6% with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.7%. The average major discrepancy rate for all residents was 1.1% with a SD of 0.4%. Trend analysis of missed cases was used to generate topic-specific resident missed case conferences on acromioclavicular joint separation injuries, elbow joint effusions, and osteochondral fractures, which resulted in an overall 64% decrease in the number of missed cases related to these injuries. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic evaluation of resident discrepancies using a simple software application provides a competency-based metric to assess call performance, establish benchmarks, and develop missed case conferences. This process is expected to result in further reduction in resident discrepancy rates and missed cases.